K.C. Stone Crushing Co. And Others v. State Of Haryana And …
State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union, Dima-Hasao District Committee & Ors (2019)8 SCC 177 In the said case, a bunch of orders passed by NGT had been challenged in Supreme Court. However, in the said judgement passed by Supreme Court, there is no reference and no discussion in respect of any bar to release of …
اقرأ أكثر
Ashok Stone Crusher,... v. State Of Uttarakhand...
Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court passed in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004 (M/S), Ms. Gupta Builders v. State of Uttaranchal. In view of the aforesaid judgment, no transit fees can be levied on the petitioner under the Forest Act.
اقرأ أكثر
State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. February 19, 2015. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004. Shri S.R. Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner(s), on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Special Leave Petitions. Print ...
اقرأ أكثر
M/S Haryana Stone Crusher vs Raj State Pollution Control …
Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court and obtained interim orders ...
اقرأ أكثر
stone+crusher | Indian Case Law | Law | CaseMine
This Court in CST v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P...2(e-1) of the U.P Act appears to be similar to the definition under consideration.7. In view of the judgment of this Court in Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd...have taken, the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Kher Stone Crusher v. G.M, District Industries Centre (1990) 79 STC 149 ...
اقرأ أكثر
Landmark Judgments – M. C. Mehta Environmental …
To save the Delhi ridge from destruction an order from the Supreme Court was obtained directing NCT of Delhi to declare it as 'Reserved Forest'. DUST POLLUTION CASE: In a historic case, 212 stone crushers were shifted out of Delhi to a 'Crushing Zone' set up in Haryana by an order of the Supreme Court on May 15th, 1992.
اقرأ أكثر
SANJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND, National Green Tribunal, Judgment
The stone crushers are in the prohibited distance as per norms which have to be applied even to existing stone crushers to enforce right of habitants to clean environment which is part of right to life. ... Reference was made to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 30.07.2009 in D.D.A. v. Rajendra Singh, (2009) ...
اقرأ أكثر
Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v. State Of Andhra Pradesh
2. The contention of the petitioner is that the said revisional order does not contain any reasons and as such the same is violative of principles of natural justice and requires to be set aside. The petitioner relied upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v.
اقرأ أكثر
Himalaya Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. v. State Of Uttarakhand
5- Issue or pass any order as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Brief controversy, which emerges out from the facts of the case, is that by the impugned Notifications during Kumbh Mela period, mining and stone crushing activities were restrained by the State Government.
اقرأ أكثر
State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 27 …
Supreme Court - Daily Orders State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 27 July, 2017 ... We find from the impugned judgment rendered by the High Court that the High Court has not dealt with various issues which were raised by the appellant herein. Instead, it has dismissed the writ petition of the appellant with the …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S. SHRIGONDA STONE CRUSHER v. MAHARASHTRA …
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S. SHRIGONDA STONE CRUSHER v. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD on CaseMine. ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
اقرأ أكثر
Closure of stone crushers leaves labour high and dry
Closure of stone crushers leaves labour high and dry. ON MAY 15 this year, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement in response to a public interest suit demanding the closure of the 300-odd stone-crushing units in and around New Delhi. Unlicensed units were immediately closed and the rest are to be shut down by August 15.
اقرأ أكثر
M/S New B N Stone Crusher vs Ut Of J&K & Ors on 4 June, …
In paragraph 20 of A. K. Kraipak (supra), the Supreme Court held thus:-"20. The aim of the rules of natural justice is to secure justice or to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of …
اقرأ أكثر
M/s. Jai Shree Ram Stone Crusher (I) Pt. Ltd, Nainital v. DCIT
4. The assessee company is engaged in the manufacturing of stone grits and dara (mixture of small stones and stone dust from boulders and stone). These boulders and stones were extracted from Gola River from Haldwani after acquiring rights from Forest Department of Uttranchal Government.
اقرأ أكثر
M/S VASAVI STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
m/s vasavi stone crusher v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA In these writ petitions, petitioners have challenged the orders passed by third respondent whereunder application filed by the respective petitioners for establishment of stone crushing unit has been rejected for the reasons indicated thereunder.
اقرأ أكثر
High Court to hear PIL against stone crusher near Rajaji Tiger …
Speaking to TOI, Dushyant Mainali, the counsel appearing for the petitioner said, "The Supreme Court guidelines clearly say that no stone crusher can operate within 10 km of a National Park.
اقرأ أكثر
M/S Shree Maruthi Stone Crushers vs State Of Karnataka on …
2020-21/462 passed by 8th Respondent in Revision Petition No.61/2018-19; (b) ISSUE an order, direction, Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 22.11.2012 passed by the 3rd Respondent vide ANNEXURE-. A and the consequent order Dated 30.01.2013 vide ANNEXURE-B bearing No. GabuE:HibuMa:
اقرأ أكثر
Supreme Court Asks Central Pollution Control Board To …
In an appeal by Ministry of Environment, the Supreme Court has called for a report from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) on the issue of pollution by Stone Crushing Units and as to ...
اقرأ أكثر
M/S Kc Stone Crushing Co vs State Of Haryana And Ors on …
Punjab-Haryana High Court M/S Kc Stone Crushing Co vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 4 February, 2021 Author: Gurvinder Singh Gill Bench: Gurvinder Singh Gill ... All Dimasa challenged in Supreme Court. However, in the said judgement Students Union, passed by Supreme Court, there is no reference and no Dima-Hasao District discussion in respect …
اقرأ أكثر
Maa Vindhya Stone Crushing Company And Another …
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by District Magistrate, Sonbhadra's order dated 20.05.2017 whereby referring to this Court's interim order dated 12.05.2017 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 18769 of 2017 (All India Kaimoor Peoples Front v.State of U.P), he has directed …
اقرأ أكثر
Sunrise Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd . v. State Of U.P. And Others
16. Sri. Hasnain has placed reliance on the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore v. ELGI Equipments Ltd.6, National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. v. Union of India7, Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I, New Delhi v.
اقرأ أكثر
M/S. D.J Stone Crusher v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
The observation of the Supreme Court cannot be termed to be 'obiter dicta' since the Supreme Court has held that the process of concrete by stone crushers is a manufacturing process. Therefore, there is no merit in the contention of the Revenue. Accordingly, all the questions are answered in favour of the assessee and against the …
اقرأ أكثر
State Of Uttarakhand & Ors. v. Kumaon Stone Crusher | Supreme Court …
It held that the character of Forest Produce is not lost by such crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 63. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed.
اقرأ أكثر
Kumaun Stone Crusher... v. State Of Uttarakhand...
In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by a Division Bench judgment dated 26-6-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004(M/B) M/s Gupta Builders v.
اقرأ أكثر
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. v. Kumaon Stone Crusher
The Allahabad High Court, in its judgment in Kumar Stone Works (Supra) decided on 27.04.2005 has given a detailed reasoning for not accepting stone grits, stone chips and …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S Upkar Stone Crusher vs Ut Of J&K & Ors on 4 June, 2021
12. Recently the Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh, 2020 SCC Online SC 847 elaborately dealt. with the scope and applicability of audi alteram partem rule. Hon'ble. the Supreme Court after surveying the entire case law, in paragraph. No.39 held thus:-"39. An analysis of the aforesaid judgments thus …
اقرأ أكثر
M/S SHRI RAM STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Supreme Court …
- 2 - After hearing learned Senior Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective appellants and the grievances made, it appears that the main grievances are two fold -. 1. The order passed by the Tribunal directing to pay Rs.20,00,000/- by each stone crusher by way of interim compensation; and . 2. That operation of the stone crushers, …
اقرأ أكثر
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Haldwani indicated that the stone crushers are located in the vicinity of residential houses and those are causing air and noise pollution in the surrounding areas.
اقرأ أكثر
Order of the National Green Tribunal regarding grant of EC to a stone
Objection of the appellant is that Doon Valley is a protected area as per Notification dated February 1, 1989 where stone crushing is not permissible in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court (Rural Litigation & Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P & Ors., AIR 1988 SC 2187).
اقرأ أكثر
Supreme Court upholds the levy of transit fee on forest
On 15 September 2017, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher deciding the issue of levy of transit ...
اقرأ أكثر